Contents of Jurisprudence
February 15, 2014
It is well
known that basic feature of legal system are mainly to be found in its
authoritative sources and the nature and working of the legal authority behind
those sources. Therefor, it obviously forms the contents of jurisprudence,
under this hand matters such as customs, legislation and precedent as a source
of law.
Codification
of laws, methods of judicial interpretation and reasoning and inquiry into the
administration of justice etc, are included for study.
Legal concepts:
Another area,
with which jurisprudence is concerned, includes analysis of legal concepts such
rights, titles, property, ownership, possession, obligations, acts, negligence,
legal personality and related issues.
Although
these entire concept are equally studied in the ordinary branches of law, but
since each of them functions in several branches of law.
Jurisprudence
tries to build up a more comprehensive picture of each concept as a whole. The
study of these abstract legal concepts furnishes a background for better
understanding of law in its various forms.
Legal theory:
Besides the
sources and forces operating behind them and various legal concepts, legal
theory also, constitutes one of the components of jurisprudence.
Legal
theory is concerned with law as it exits and functions in this society, and the
manner in which law created and enforces as also the influence of social
opinion and law on each other.
Thus, legal
theory seeks to link law with other disciplines and pursue its study in a wider
social prospective. It is therefore, necessary that while analyzing legal
concept, an effort should be made to present them in the backgroundof social
development and changing economic and political attitudes.
Relation of jurisprudence with other social science:
Jurisprudence & Ethics:
Ethics as a
branch of knowledge deals with human conduct and lays down the ideals of human
behavior. It is closely related to morality and public opinion, which are
dynamic concepts varying from place to place, from time to time, and from
people to people.
What may be
a good morality at one time may not necessarily remain so all time and it may
even become a bad moral conduct in time to come. Thus, the public opinion and
moral precepts go on changing with social regulation, social culture and social
development.
Jurisprudence
is concerned with positive morality since law is
considered as an instrument of regulates human conduct in the society. Positive
morality does not depend on ideal behavior or good actions but it requires
coercive force for maintaining public conscience.
There is a
separate branch of jurisprudence called ethical jurisprudence, which seeks to
lay down the standards of ideal for human conduct in terms of law for
maintenance of public conscience. It must; however, be stated that there are
many unethical acts, which lay does not seeks to punish.
For example,the law does not take notice of
trifles, so also to tell a lie is unethical but it is not punishable as an
offence. Conversely, all that is prohibited is not necessarily immoral e.g. possessing
land beyond ceiling limit is punishable under the law but it is not unethical
act.
Generallyspeaking,
law must not be divorced from accepted human values since it is an instrument
for regulation human conduct in a given society. As Dr. M.J. Sethna rightly pointed out, las of
community are reflected in its culture, ideology and norms, they are therefor;
indicators of country’s civilization and the ethical standard of the society
hence ethical value cannot be excluded from jurisprudence.
Jurisprudence & Psychology:
Psychology
as a branch of knowledge is concern with the working of brain or mental
faculty. Since, jurisprudence and law are necessarily concerned with human
action and it is the human mind, which control human action, and inter-relation
between psychology and jurisprudence need not be over emphasized. Particularly
in dealing with crimes the psychology of criminals is generally taken into
consideration. Again, psychology plays a dominant role in the study of
criminology and penology. The psychology of an offence is also one of the
crucial factors in deciding the nature of the punishment of the convicted
person.
The modern reformative techniques
of punishments such as probation, parole, in determinate sentence, admonition,
pardon etc, are essentially device for the treatment of offenders according to
their psychological trails.
That apart, legal concept such as
negligence, intention, motive, means rea, recklessness, rashness etc. pertains
to the faculty of mind and therfor, they form a part of study of psychology as
also the jurisprudence.
Jurisprudence & history:
It is difficult to appreciate the
present law and legal system without probing into its part historical revolution.
Therefor, there is close inter-relation between jurisprudence and history.
History consists of the study of
past event in their proper perspective. Thus, in order tounderstand the
constitutional jurisprudence of country, it is necessary to look into its past
constitutional history.
It may, therefor, be concluded that
the study of different branches of law essential requires their study in the
historical perspective without which its knowledge would remain incomplete.
Jurisprudence & sociology:
Sociology also includes the study
of a part of law to some extent. For example, criminology is one of the
inter-disciplinary subjects related to both sociology andlaw. Again,
jurisprudence includes within its compass, the sociology of law that is the
practical functioning of law in the society.
Further, sociology as well as the
study of jurisprudence is concerned with regulation of human conduct in the
society. Therefore, the two are intimate connected.
It must, however, be noted in this
context that lawyers approach to law in different from that of a sociologist’s
attitude towards law.
The lawyer’s looks it from the
point of view enforceability and obedience by the people, while the sociologist
concentrates on studying how these rules actually govern the behavior of
individual in the society.
More recently, the judges have
accepted the role of sociology and its relationship with law it is often
reflected in their decisions.
G.W Patton has support the
relationship between law and sociology for three obvious reasons:
(1) It enables
better understanding of the evolution and development of law.
(2) It
provides greater substratum for identity of law commensurate with human needs
and societal interest; and
(3) It
provide objectively to legal interpretation, which is the need of the hour
Without social inter-action, law
would remain a mere theoretical perception devoid of any practical utility.
Jurisprudence & economics:
Economics being a science of money
and wealth and jurisprudence a science of law, both are intimately co-related.
Economics deals with production and distribution of wealth for satisfying the
wealth of the people. It is one of the major factors responsible for the
incidence of crimes.
There are
many laws, which seeks to regulate economic activities of humankind- such as
laws relating to banking, companies, negotiable instrument, consumer
production, ceiling of land and wealth, payment of wages, bonus, insurance,
debt etc are intended to regulate one of the other economic activity of man in
society.
Law of
poverty has developed as a separate branch of law for the welfare of the poor.
The ultimate aim of economics as well as jurisprudence is to improve the
standard of life of the people for the welfare of the community as a whole. The
law of population control provides best example of it.
Jurisprudence & politics:
Freidman remarked that jurisprudence is
linked at one end with philosophy at other end with political theory. Political
science dealswith the principles governing the governmental organization. State
is a politically organized society, which makes law for good governs of the
people.
Politicians
who are representatives of the people from the legislature are the law-making
organs of the government. This amply reflects on the relationship of
jurisprudence that means science of law with politics.