What is the legal status of (c) Dead person (d) Animals Q . Ordinarily, the personality of human being may be said to commence on birth and ceases to exist on death. Discuss what are the rights of dead person.
February 13, 2014
1
The
word “Person” is derived form the Latin word
“Persona” . to begin with, it simply meant a mask, than it was used to
denote the part played by a man in life and then in the sense of a man who
played the part. But now under a legal theory, a person is any being who is
capable of sustaining rights and duties. Any being that is so capable is a
person whether he is a human being or not.
Definition Of Person:
According To Prof. salmond:
“A person is any being whom the law regards as
capable of rights or duties. Any being that is so capable is a person, whether
a human being or not and no being capable is a person, even though he is a
man.”
According To Gray:
“Person
is an entity to which rights and duties may be attributed.”
Legal Status
Of Dead Person:
The
personality of human being commences its existence on birth and ceases to exist
at death. Dead men are no longer persons in the eye of law. They have no rights
because they have no interests. All that the law does is, it to some degree
recognizes and takes into account after a man, s death his desires and
interests when alive.
Rights Of Dead Person:
There
are three things in respect of which the anxieties of living men extend even
after their death. Those are his body his reputation and his estate.
Body:
A
living men is interested in the treatment to be given to his own dead-body. A
corpse is the property of on one. It cannot be disposed of by will or any other
instrument criminal law secures a decent burial for all dead men and the
violation of a grave is a criminal offence.
Reputation:
The
reputation of a person receives some degree of protection form criminal law. A
libel upon a dead man is punished as a
misdemeanor when its publication is an attack on the interests of living
person. As a matter of fact this right is in reality not that of the dead
person but of his living descendents.
Property:
A
dead man continue to determine the enjoyment of the property, which he owned,
while he was alive. The law of succession permits the desires of the dead
person to regulate the actions of the living persons. In addition to this,
whatever he has left behind to distributed as gifts or given in charity will be
respect by law and enforced according to his wishes laid down is a proper
document i.e., will deed.
Legal Status Of
Unborn Person:
Before
discussing the status of unborn person, we must distinguish a child who is
living in womb of its mother and an unborn child in the sense of future
generations i.e., who is not conceived in the womb of its mother. The law given
a statue of person to a child who is not yet been born but conceived in its
mother’ s womb.
According to coke:
“The
law in many cases hath consideration of him in respect of the apparent
expectation of his birth,:
Contingency Of Rights Of
Unborn Person:
The
rights of unborn person whether proprietary or personal are all contingent on
his birth as a living human being.
Rights Of Unborn Person:
Following
are the rights of a unborn person.
Rights to Compensation:
An
unborn child is entitled to compensation for the death of his father, willful
or negligent injury inflicted on a child in the womb.
Rights to be born:
An
unborn person has a right to be born and abortion and child destruction are
declared as crimes to protect his right of him.
A pregnant woman condemned to death is respited as of right until she
has been delivered of her child.
Right to Inherit:
In
unborn child may inherit, but if he dies in the womb or is still-born, his
inheritance fails to take effect and on one claim thought him.
Beneficiary of trust:
An
unborn child may be made beneficiary of the trust and such trust cannot be
varied without obtaining the consent of the Court on their behalf.
Right to own:
There
is nothing in law to prevent a man form owing property before he is born. His
ownership is contingent on his born alive and once born alive, his contingent
ownership will become vested.
Right to gift:
A
direct gift may be made to the child in womb.
Right to Partition:
In
Hindu Law , if a partition is made, a share should be allotter to a child in
the womb which is contingent on his as a living human being.
Legal Status Of Animals:
Primitive View:
Beasts
were regarded as persons in the old days. There are examples in Greek law where
they tried and punished for offences to human beings.
Modern View:
In
modern law animals are not regarded as person, they are things. The only
natural person are human beings and beasts are not person either natural or
legal. They are merely things.
Reasons For Incapability:
Following
are the reasons for incapability of animals as person.
Not subjects of rights:
They
are often the object of legal rights and duties but never the subject of them.
Acts:
Their
acts are neither lawful nor unlawful.
Subject-matter:
They
are not recognized by law as the appropriate subject-matter either of
permission or prohibition.
Incapability:
A
beast in incapable of legal rights as of legal duties.
Recognition:
His
interests are not recognized by law.
Moral rights:
They
possess moral rights but those are not recognized by any legal system.
Cannot be the owner:
No
animal can be owner of any property even through the medium of a human trustee.
Exceptions:
There
are two cases in which beasts may be thought to possess legal rights.
Cruelty
to animals is a criminal offence.
A
trustee for the benefit of particular class of animals is made like broken down
horses.
Criticism:
Cruelty
to animals is an offence not because of any love animals but because of the
ill effects produced in society by
perpetuation of cruelty.
The
trust is crated for the protection and
benefit not an individual animal but for a group as it is charitable and public
trust. All these duties are contemplated by law not towards the animals but
towards society.
Conclusion:
To
conclude, I can say, that according to the legal theory, only that being is
designated as person who is capable of holding rights and duties, irrespective
of the fact whether he is human being or not, existed or not. i.e.,
corporations, idols, dead and unborn child are the best examples of his concept
of personality.